Unauthorized soft-shelled hyperbaric chambers may pose serious health risks 2026-06-16
What the notice records
| Product | Unauthorized soft-shelled hyperbaric chambers |
|---|---|
| Issue | Unauthorised device |
| What you should do | Do not use soft-shelled hyperbaric chambers.Consult a healthcare practitioner if you have used a soft-shelled hyperbaric chamber and you have concerns about your health.Only use licensed medical devices. Check whether medical devices have been authorized for sale in Canada by searching Health Canada's Medical Devices Active Licence Listing.Report complaints involving medical devices, including health complications or the sale of unlicensed devices, to Health Canada. |
| Category | Medical devices |
| Publishing body | Communications and Public Affairs Branch |
| Class | Class not stated |
| Last updated | 2026-06-16 |
Read the official notice on recalls-rappels.canada.ca
Everything in Medical devices · Everything from Communications and Public Affairs Branch
Read this correctly
This page reproduces the fields published on the notice and links to the notice itself. It is not a rating and not a statement about a product's current condition, availability or safety.
This notice carries no class in the published data. A blank class means the field is blank — it is not a statement that the product was low risk.
Privacy
This site publishes records that governments already publish. It sets no cookie and makes no request to Google unless you accept one. Read more below.
About this record
Every recall notice published by Health Canada: the product, the issue recorded against it, the class assigned, and the official notice itself. A record of what was published, on the date it was published.
Source: Health Canada — Recalls and safety alerts (open data) — Open Government Licence – Canada. Data refreshes daily. Every page links the row it came from.
What this site is not. It is a copy of an official record. It is not a judgement about any business, building or person, and it is not advice. If the record is wrong, the source above is where it is corrected.